Debat og råd om TV-skærme. Alt hvad der handler om køb og brug af fladskærme

Redaktører: AndreasL, Moderatorer

#231692
PeterD skrev:
DVHampe skrev:
PeterD skrev:Næ. LG har vel også noget, men syntes ikke de er helt fremme i test (Kan godt være jeg har overset nogle)

Og nu nat vi er ved de 5 "Store", så er der også dette:

http://m.pricerunner.dk/pl/2-3052206/TV ... ign-Priser
Men den har vel kun 50 panel Hz??
Hvor ser du det?

Her skriver de: "100 Hz BMR"

http://www.panasonic.com/uk/consumer/vi ... specs.html
Det kan du godt have ret i - men TechRadar basher den en del for judder i panoreringer...
#231693
Det er sandt.

"The Max setting was unnaturally smooth and Minimum didn't quite solve the juddering in our Star Trek: Into Darkness test footage, but Mid provided a welcome middle ground."

Spørgsmålet er om du helt slipper for det på nogle af tvene?

Ellers skal du måske op i størrelse og over i OLED, men så holder 5000 kr nok ikke helt..

Til sammenligning her Samsungs JU6475:

"Moving along, the refresh rate and judder issues in the JU6475 are problematic and if you’re a major fan of 24p DVD, streaming and Blu-ray movies, this is not a model you’d want to go for. It’s also not your best bet for streamed or otherwise sportcasts and 4K UHD gaming since its native refresh rate sits at just 60Hz with an artificial Samsung Motion Rate bump up to 120Hz. However, Motion Rate isn’t the same as native refresh and those 60Hz do provoke some problems here and there.

Additionally, Samsung could have also included true Local Dimming technology in the JU6475 for the sake of some even better, finer detail when it comes to varying between light and dark on the screen during movies and other programming. However, instead of real Local Dimming technology, the JU6475 comes with that the manufacturer calls “UHD Dimming” which is a weak-sauce substitute for actual local dimming."

Sorry. Lukker ned for idag ..ZzzzZzzZzz :)