Lige for en sikkerheds skyld:
SUHD giver ikke i sig selv et bedre billede end en normal Full HD skærm, men det lyder flot.
Bla. Cnet.com skriver:
"Despite the nanocrystal-powered color and HDR compatibility inherent in Samsung's SUHD name, the JS8500 doesn't offer appreciably better image quality than many less expensive TVs. It has lighter black levels than some top competitors, an issue exacerbated by HDR content that requires maximum light output.
"The bottom line: The Samsung UNJS8500 SUHD TV has a very good picture for an edge-lit LED LCD, but not good enough to justify the price."
"Samsung has spent a lot of money promoting its new "SUHD" TVs as different, better and, above all, worth the higher price compared to regular old UHD (aka 4K) TVs.The JS8500 is the company's least expensive SUHD TV (Som er et LCD)..
"Bit Colour". " Nano Crystal". "Super Duper Sharp"..Reklame. Reklame. Reklame.
Hmm. Ju7005 kunne være en mulighed måske men her siger nogle test:
"Billedet har nogle uønskede elementer i form af lyse pletter på mørk baggrund, som reducerer den totale kontrast. Et kedeligt kvalitetsproblem, som vi havde håbet at slippe for i denne prisklasse."
http://www.lydogbillede.dk/test/tv/samsung-ue65ju7005/
Egentlig fuldstændig ligeglad med hvad der købes bare I får den bedste kvalitet for prisen.
http://m.pricerunner.dk/cl/2/TV?attr_2000000=41142194